Landscape Urbanism Studio | UW Dept of Landscape Architecture | Winter 2005
|
performance analysis |
Evaluation showed design interventions to be moderately to highly successful at meeting detention requirements while using non-traditional stormwater strategies (shown as % of detention requirement met): |
||
By surface type:
By landuse type: |
Roofs (13): Parking lots (7): R.O.W. (7)
Public Spaces (3): Commercial/Retail (5): Mixed Use/Residential (3): Industrial/Warehouse (5): R.O.W. (7): |
80 – 500+% 70 – 300+% 90 – 600+%
80 – 200+% 90 – 1000+% 80 – 500+% 70 – 600+% 90 – 500+% |
(numbers in parentheses show the number of students whose design addressed a category)
|
||
Design performance for detention/retention of stormwater was evaluated using methods outlined in Seattle's Flow Control Manual including: Further work included:
|
||
To determine impact at the site-scale, Flow Control Manual numbers for allowable site discharge were used to calculate the detention needed to lighten impact on the entire system, yielding: |
|
<<This information was incorporated into a user-friendly Excel model
|
Since information (such as void space of locally-available landscape materials) were not available, a team of students measured some of these parameters to improve performance calculations in the stormwater model. |
||
| |
<< results in Excel
students in action >> |
|